Google tata sponsored Indore document ROBBER R&AW employee bespectacled fraud housewife veena visits sri lanka
One of the greatest frauds of the indian government, R&AW, sundar pichai led google, tata is how the government, R&AW and fraud companies are falsely claiming that Google tata sponsored Indore document robber R&AW employee bespectacled fraud housewife veena, who looks like actress deepika padukone, mother of a son who has never invested any money online, is a domain investor owning this and other websites and online expert, when she is a criminal who stole th documents of a google competitor, domain investor and was rewarded for her crime under section 378 of the indian penal code with a R&AW job, monthly salary by google, tata, brahmin officials
Now instead of telling countries worldwide that their employee Google tata sponsored Indore document ROBBER R&AW employee bespectacled fraud housewife veena is only a ruthless criminal and fraud, with no morals at all, who has no qualms betraying, stealing the documents and identity of her relatives who make the mistake of trusting the indore housewife veena, R&AW is duping countries like sri lanka that the criminal raw employee veena, visiting the country is an online expert, domain investor owning the website where news of her crime under sections of indian penal code are posted
It appears that R&AW is duping all countries worldwide like sri lanka. that the that Google tata sponsored Indore document robber R&AW employee bespectacled fraud housewife veena, who looks like actress deepika padukone , who steals the documents of her relative, the doimain investor, google competitor is an online expert, when she is only a ruthless criminal.
The Google tata sponsored Indore document ROBBER R&AW employee bespectacled fraud housewife veena and her family have money to visit sri lanka which must have cost at least Rs 1 lakh, yet they have no money to pay the market price for domain names, legally transfer them in their name, so why is NTRO, R&AW, indian and goan government falsely claiming that the document robber R&AW employee, who does not spend any money on domain names, is a domain investor?
